Sidewalk-adjacent news

Sidewalk-adjacent news: they have started clearing trees away for the “Michigan Avenue Rehabilitation” project, which is supposed to improve the Michigan Avenue corridor from Pennsylvania to 127 – in other words, the length of the east side – for pedestrians and bicyclists.

Fans of the blog know I’m inclined toward anything that improves sidewalks. I’m also in favor of bicycle lanes, especially when they mean cyclists won’t be risking collisions with pedestrians on the sidewalk. I get why they ride on the sidewalk, and when I rode my bike I would ride on the sidewalk on Michigan too since the alternative is worse, but I’d still rather not have them scare me by blowing past my shoulder inches away (often without warning as they should).

The trouble is that I’m also generally opposed to anything that involves removing mature trees. The honey locust trees on this stretch are pretty, making for nice shade and pleasant colors. They stand in dedicated little holes in the sidewalk that I’ve always found a bit fascinating. According to the official phasing map, the city is going to replace them one to one – actually better than one to one in some blocks – but a tree that has already had decades to grow is always better than a new planting. I wish they had tried harder to work around them, at least keeping the ones that could be kept.

Let Them Be Green

The March 2, 1971, [Lansing] State Journal, brings us an article with the wonderful headline, “If Sidewalks Must Be – Let Them Be Green”:

South Whitehills residents who have been opposed to sidewalks in their neighborhood since the city ordered them installed two years ago offered a counter-proposal to city council Monday night calling for fewer sidewaks and asking that they be made of green concrete. [. . .] “It’s being done, you know green sidewalks are being made,” remarked Lester Turner, attorney for the Whitehills residents, when council members greeted his green sidewalk proposition with stares.

Whitehills is a subdivision in East Lansing. I tried to do a Google search to find pictures of what, exactly, a green sidewalk looks like, but it was confounded by all the results being about eco-friendly sidewalks rather than sidewalks made of literally green concrete.

I’m not familiar with Whitehills, but the street they were especially opposed to having sidewalks installed on, Whitehills Drive, does currently have sidewalks installed on both sides according to Google Street View, so evidently they lost the battle sooner or later. I find it nearly impossible to get into the headspace of someone who is so opposed to having sidewalks installed in their neighborhood that they would take the matter to court, but that’s why I’m the one writing this blog.

Politics, city services, and sidewalk clearing

Here’s another interesting item I found while scrounging around in old [Lansing] State Journals, this one from January 26, 1947. It’s a front page, leftmost column titled “By the Way.” (The main headlines that day were “Liquor Board Shakeup Seen” and, just under it, “‘Scarface’ Al Capone Dead,” and much as it is tempting to put the two together, they are unrelated events.)

Here is the column in its entirety:

Lansing city officials and aldermen who nave had long experience in municipal government affairs have about come to the conclusion that citizens are willing to pay more taxes if they receive a fair return in services they demand. The old logic of municipal authorities, which largely holds true today, is that the budget should be pared to the bone, so to speak, to keep taxes down and the taxpayers happy. However, with fast changing times this thought is rapidly giving way to a reversal of the old logic. Officials are finding that citizens demand only the best with cost a secondary matter. Prime example of the new thought trend is a demand for quick service by the public works department in clearing the streets of snow and caring for icy streets In winter months. The average citizen wants his street and sidewalk plowed out within a couple of hours after a snowfall. With present equipment this job takes from 24 to 36 or more hours. It is a physical impossibility to complete the work in less time. Budget-minded officials, seeking to save the taxpayer added costs, takes a “beating” in complaints from citizens. These questions therefore present themselves to the aldermen and department heads: Should several thousand dollars more be Invested in additional snow removal equipment which is used relatively few times during the year in this work? Would the taxpayer be willing to pay a little more to get this “deluxe super-service?” Officials think the citizens would pay more, but harbor the fear of scathing criticism which comes after Mr. Citizen gets his new tax bill. Such services cannot be added or enlarged without additional expense. Aldermen know this and hesitate to take any action until they know just “how much” each project will cost. Additional employes, maintenance and numerous other items must be considered, because these must be paid through future years. Small pressure groups have little success in “bulling” their pet projects through the city council, but city-wide sentiment favoring some particular service or project is sure to receive serious attention and most likely, favorable action by the aldermen. 

I didn’t realize I was reading the news organ of Bizarro Lansing. “Citizens demand only the best with cost a secondary matter,” you say? That must be nice. More to the point of this blog, though, is this: “The average citizen wants his street and sidewalk plowed out within a couple of hours after a snowfall.” That evidently means that the city used to clear sidewalks instead of having a useless and nearly unenforced ordinance requiring residents to do it themselves (eventually). I now really want to know when that changed.

News tidbit from 1949

I found a small tidbit in the October 4, 1949 [Lansing] State Journal:

The city council Monday night agreed to pay for the expense of boring about 350 holes in downtown sidewalks for use by merchants in displaying flags on standards in front of their stores. Merchants previously had asked that the holes be put in the sidewalks back from the curb so they could display Michigan State college banners and American flags. 

Most of the sidewalks downtown appear to be of recent vintage, bearing stamps from the 2000s or later. Still, I wonder if I can find any sidewalks downtown still showing evidence of these flagpole holes. I will have to check next time I’m downtown.

New Posting Schedule

When I reached the second anniversary, I decided to consider changing the blog’s update schedule again. It was originally updated daily, but I cut back to three times a week as I began to run out of new stamps within my daily walk radius. With another year gone by, it’s become apparent that I once again need to make an adjustment to match how many new sidewalk-related tidbits I’m finding on a regular basis. The fact that I am working more hours than I was a year ago factors into this decision too. So, beginning this week, I will be posting each Monday and Friday.

Thank you for reading! Both of you!

Malcolm X St. sidewalk reconstruction

I had hopes of getting out to a stamp on my “to do” list for today’s entry. It’s one I spotted on a walk quite a while ago, on Hickory Street. It looked old and possibly novel, but it was too muddy to read. I thought if I got lucky someone might have shoveled the sidewalk, leaving a bit of snow in the stamp, because sometimes that makes the old ones more legible. Unfortunately, my plans came to nought due to having a very poor night’s sleep that meant I had to nap this afternoon and left me walking after dark again. So instead, I’ll just have to give you a bit of sidewalk news I ran across recently.

A segment of I-496 (the Olds Freeway) between Lansing Road and the Grand River will be undergoing a big reconstruction project that will start in April and run through the rest of 2022 and into 2023. 496 will be completely closed from June to November of this year. The reason I took notice of this for the sidewalk blog is this statement in an article from WLNS.com: “The project aims to widen I-496, resurface sidewalks, and upgrade ramps along the I-496 service drives between M-99 and Grand River.” (This is a somewhat confusing statement as it suggests Grand River Avenue, but 496 doesn’t touch Grand River. They meant the Grand River, as in the body of water.) By “the I-496 service drives” I have to assume they mean (at least in part) Malcolm X Street. Two important points for sidewalk fans. First, those new sidewalks had better be stamped, although the city’s recent track record with enforcing the sidewalk marking code has been very poor. Second, I had better get out there before April and start taking some sidewalk photos.